On this special segment of the Full Ratchet, the following
investors are featured:
Each investor highlights a situation with a startup that they decided not to invest in and why it was that they passed
Joanne: I wish I could say theres one that Damn, Im sorry I missed on that one. I dont know, but theres one at the very beginning when I started this, I had the ability to invest in one company that actually become really big. And it was a note, and I thought they should be doing equity. I didnt believe in the note. But then I learned, wait a second, everyone does notes in this angel investing stuff. So that was a lesson learned. But in general, I meet so many different entrepreneurs every day, and sometimes people come in and talk to me and I think Wow, great business! Too bad its yours.
Joanne: And so, you know, and other times people come in and I go Wow, youre fricken amazing. This is such an awful business. So you know, I do think that the lessons have been where wrong decisions have been made in the companies, or companies have closed How to keep the door open has really been a learning lesson for me and entrepreneurs You know, in general, every days a learning lesson. And theres no real in particular great story except the one person where I may want the money back. But, in general, you know I feel like all these entrepreneurs that Ive invested in are an extension of my family, and all I want to do is see them have success at the level they want to see their success at. And some are bigger, and some are smaller.
Nick: Sort of a shame when that business founder fit or that product found fit just isnt there.
Joanne: It is, but you know, you hear less about that but theres more of that than there is success stories.
Nick: On todays special segment, we have Jeffrey Carter. Jeffrey, can you tell us a story about a startup that you chose not to invest in, why is was that you passed, and if there was a key learning that now informs your approach?Jeffrey: Theres one I passed on that I really wish I wouldve written a check for. My reason for passing was probably not a good reason, and the startup is FarmLogs. Came through HPA, I had a chance to write a check, and Im trying to raise a fund. Im raising a fund with West Loop Ventures, and so I wanted to differentiate myself form the group, make sure that I had enough outside deals that werent group deals. And so I passed. It was a great company, I knew the space really well. I think the future of the company is bigger than what theyre letting on right now. So thats one I passed on that I really wish I wouldve done. And that was a Y Combinator company as well.Theres some that I passed on and I glad I passed because either the companies failed or they just havent really gone anywhere. I think the ones that I pass on, usually they have to do with the fact that I dont think the founder can sell or build a team, or the company feels that its solving too small of a problem. It doesnt feel like it can get big so its sort of restricted by the vision or the parameters that people set up.And sometimes the other reason that I would pass is I like to have a relationship with the founders. I dont mind if they disagree with me at all. In fact, sometimes its healthy. But I think in many cases, theyre just so averse to considering any other viewpoint. Theyre not whats called coachable. And so if you cant work with a founder, it doesnt behoove you to invest at a seed level, because its just gonna be a rocky relationship no matter how good the company every becomes.The other reason that I passedI passed on some deals that I thought were some absolutely spectacular deals, and Ive passed because of the valuation or the structure of the deal. And in some cases, although this has changed for me, in the first few years, when I was investing, I would only invest in the Midwest because I wanted to invest close to me. And now thats not necessarily true. So I invested in a company in Toronto last year, getvideostream.com. If you have an Android phone with Chromecast, its amazing product, amazing team.I passed on a deal out of Auburn, California. They were raising their early stage round. Great team, great products, I really loved everything about it, except it was in Auburn, California, so I passed. A year later, the same entrepreneur came back to be and said I would love to have you in this deal. Do you want to get in? I said I really do, but the price was significantly higher, and I still got in. I got in, I didnt the deal. And that company is Riskalyze, and hes blowing the doors off everything. Hes a great entrepreneur, a great company. Since we invested in the last round, he set up an Atlanta office, hes probably hired another thirty employees and hes just doing really well. So I learned from my mistake.But it was might focus saying Im only gonna do Midwest, not dissimilar from the uncoachable entrepreneur, that stopped me from investing in the company. So it wasnt him, it was me.Nick: Its interesting, we had Dave Berkus on the program, and he had a rule that, I think, his investments had to be within flying distance of his single prop plane, and I think he passed on Amazon. He had a seed opportunity.
Jeffrey: Oh, wow!
Nick: Yeah. With one of his
Jeffrey: Get a better plane! [both laughing]
Nick: Time to upgrade to the jet!
Nick: For this installment of Why I Passed, speaking with Imran Ahmad of OCA Ventures. Imran, can you tell us a story about a startup that you chose not to invest in, why it was that you passed, and if there was a key learning that now informs your approach?
Imran: This is always a tough thing for venture capitalists, because theres a lot of good deals that you end up passing on thatBessemer calls it their unportfolio, I believe, where its companies that you really wish youd hit. The Facebooks of the world, the Starbucks of the world, etcetera. So for me, Id sayand Im not gonna name any namesbut Id say a company I passed on was a loyalty program. And this was something that I thought was very capital intensive, it was something that, at the end of the day, youre building a two-sided network and a two-sided model and it can be incredibly difficult to do, and it was a crowded marketplace. There were a lot of people doing it. The barriers to entry werent that significant, in my mind, when I initially evaluated it. Obviously the companys proven me wrong, today.
And what you learn from these types of processes is that at the end of the day if you find a very strong entrepreneur whos got the gumption and the team and the resources to get stuff done, a capital intensive business is not necessarily the worst thing in the world. These things can be overcome. A business where theres a lot of competitors and a lot of people at play, its not the worst thing in the world. Theres gonna be a leader that emerges and fragmented markets are usually good things. When I was in private equity, we would look for fragmented markets, develop a platform and start rolling up a bunch of businesses within that platform. Its not quite the same on the venture side of the equation, however, finding a fragmented market and then putting a bunch of money in backing a clear-cut leader allows you to reallynot necessarily put all the other companies down the space, but have one true leader emerge.
How many food delivery startups are there? Yet GrubHub and Seamless eventually emerged victorious. And so those types of business models are tough to avoid, and its anyones game. Venture capital is, again, a risky business but it also has a little bit of luck thats involved and youre gonna pass on deals and thats just part of the game.
Nick: So you mentioned entrepreneur gumption and you talked about sort of these local businesses. So now that youve had that experience passing, what do you do next time around when you see that business again? What are the things that youre looking for that are gonna push you to yes?
Imran: Due diligence. Its, uhits gonna be a big part of that. But at the end of the day, its really seeing and checking your gut. And a lot of this business is a gut check, and its tough. I know Im gonna pass on some of these businesses again in the future and that may be one of the hardest things to wake up to every morning if I passed on a billion dollar business that ended up being Snapchat, I mean, who in their right might thought Snapchat wouldve done as well as it has done? I mean itsits one of those things Yeah, my message disappears okay but thing are gonna do well, youre just gonna pass on. So you have to be comfortable with that in this industry.
Nick: Yeah, Chris Yeh on episode two mentioned the same exact business, Snapchat. And how could you predict that, I dont know. But I think its challenging not to second guess your focus and your strategy when those things happen.
Imran: Yes, definitely. And maybe its worth second guessing it if you keep passing on all of these big deals. Thankfully, that hasnt happened yet for me, but you never know.
Posted in: Investor Stories
Tagged with: accelerators, Angel, Angel Investing, AngelList, Crowdfunding, Entrepreneur, Founder, incubators, Investing, Investor, pitch competitions, pitch deck, Seed, SeriesA, Start-up, Start-up Fundraising, Start-up Investing, Startup, Startup Fundraising, Startup Investing, tech investing, technology, VC, Venture, Venture Capital, Venture Capitalist
- 134. The Importance of Storytelling, VC EQ, and the LP-GP Dating Game, Part 2 (James R. ‘Trey’ Hart III)
- 133. The Importance of Storytelling, VC EQ, and the LP-GP Dating Game, Part 1 (James R. ‘Trey’ Hart III)
- 132. Nick Moran is Interviewed on Bootstrapping in America
- 131. How Amazon, Fitbit & Snap Won; Where Apple, Pebble & Google Did Not, Part 2 (Ben Einstein)
- 130. How Amazon, Fitbit & Snap Won; Where Apple, Pebble & Google Did Not, Part 1 (Ben Einstein)
- Investor Stories 61: Why I Invested (Roberts, Struhl, Verrill)
- Investor Stories 60: Why I Passed (Triest & DeMarrais, Tsai, Larkins & Galston)
- Investor Stories 59: Lessons Learned (Olsen, Collett, Sanwal)
- Investor Stories 58: What’s Next (Kurzweil, Buttrick, Hudson)
- Investor Stories 57: Exceptional Founders (Wilkins, Mason, Benaich)