Archive for the ‘Venture Weekly Issue’ Category

Venture Weekly Editor’s Note – 5/23/2016

The Reality of Equity Crowdfunding

This past week, the SEC’s new equity crowdfunding rules enacted under the JOBS Act officially took effect, so as of last Monday, previously non-accredited investors (basically those with less than $1M net worth, excluding their home) can finally start investing directly in startup equity.

In this week’s issue we’ve featured a post from Jason Calacanis about equity crowdfunding.  Jason is certainly one of the most bullish public advocates for the new rules, and it’s easy to understand why, given that he is the leader of one of the largest AngelList syndicates.  However, in his post Jason paints a picture of a world where every mom and pop will be able to share in the wealth created by technological disruption, a vision I believe is overoptimistic.

Read More...

-Mike Droesch, Founding Editor


Venture Weekly Issue 50

Top Story
   »Discussing Brad’s approach to making difficult decisions

 

Perspectives
   »Discussing the need for venture scale returns on a venture-oriented timeframe

 

   »Discussing how non-accredited investors should think about jumping into crowdfunded angel investing

 

   »Explaining the different exit options for startups and why we need more IPOs

 

Market Trends
   »Analyzing the journey of disruption through the lense of traditional retailers being disrupted by e-commerce

 

   »Illustrating the landscape of tech companies providing alternative data for investors

 

Startup Focus
   »Analyzing why A/B testing may not be applicable for early stage SaaS companies with limited user traffic

 

   »Discussing the benefits of having happy employees in the workplace

 

   »Guiding founders on how to build a well-balanced and effective early stage board

 

Interviews
   »Discussing how to approach studying and getting smart on an emerging market sector

Venture Weekly Editor’s Note – 5/17/2016

Is the Tech Press Hunting Unicorns?

Startups had another tough week in the tech press. William Alden wrote a damning expose on Palantir, one of the Valley’s most secretive companies up to this point, to which co-founder Joe Lonsdale replied on Quora. Former VP of Engineering at uBeam Paul Reynolds published a blog post this past week basically saying that the technology can’t work as advertised (which was picked up by many, many outlets). Mark Suster, VC at Upfront Ventures and uBeam board member, responded here.

Read More...

Venture Weekly Issue 49

Top Story
   »Sharing Om’s thoughts VC, and its outsized impact on innovation, on the occasion of his partner stepping down from the NVCA

 

Perspectives
   »Explaining how an investor’s emotions can impact the quality of the investments they make

 

   »Responding to uBeam retractors and more general thoughts about staying focused, taking risks and the challenge of innovation at the bleeding edge

 

   »Summarizing key lessons for developing strong startup ecosystems based on the history of Silicon Valley

 

Market Trends
   »Analyzing the decline in VC investment over 2016 and which stages have been hit the hardest

 

   »Illustrating some notable differences in financial performance between the top B2B and B2C companies

 

Startup Focus
   »Explaining the components of Brand Marketing and best-in-class examples from the former CMO of Just Eat

 

   »Using customer “inflection points” to help your startup gain distribution and scale

 

   »Guiding SaaS founders on how to overcome the challenge of growing from initial traction to $10M in ARR

 

Interviews
   »Diving deeper than just the “pipeline problem” to uncover what is truly driving the lack of women in tech

Venture Weekly Issue 47 – Entrepreneurship is Both Risky and Daring

Top Story
   »Defending why seed investors should lead
Perspectives
   »Describing why there has been a spike in established VCs raising new funds in early 2016, and how other firms should consider approaching LPs
   »Championing bold entrepreneurship in the face of staggering odds as the way to truly change the world
   »Describing why investors need to be thoughtful and respectful in passing on investment opportunities
Market Trends
   »Exploring the old saying “too many VC dollars chasing too few good deals,” and why this is unlikely to change any time soon
   »Highlighting top companies at Collision 2016
Startup Focus
   »Explaining in simple terms why each $1 of funding means $10 in expected exit value – and the implications thereof
   »Arguing that there are only three ways a startup should approach pricing
   »Describing how understanding learning profiles can improve hiring and reduce employee turnover
Interviews
   »Discussing how to approach investing in great hardware companies

 

Entrepreneurship is Both Risky and Daring

What is a venture? A search on Google returns the following definition for “venture”: “a risky or daring journey or undertaking.” This definition seems to perfectly encapsulate the meaning of a venture in the context of entrepreneurship. But this definition actually represents two definitions, one skewing towards “risky” and one skewing towards “daring.” Both perspectives are important, both are true, and it is an awareness of both that makes the pursuit of entrepreneurship so rewarding.

 

Regarding the “risky” piece, Bryce Roberts rehashes in Are We Reaching the Limits of Silicon Valley’s Venture Model? the adage that there are “too many VC dollars chasing too few good deals,” and that this is a trend that won’t end well: “Maybe the answer to the liquidity problems facing the Silicon Valley VC model isn’t a cleaner termsheet or a wider IPO window. As the old saying, history and data suggest, there are ‘too many VC dollars chasing too few good deals,’ but that hasn’t stopped anyone from doing more of the same.” This is a cold, analytical, and important component of entrepreneurship, typically found in greater measure on the investing side.

 

On the “daring” side of things, Vinod Khosla states in The case for intelligent failure to invent the future, “Too often, there is a tendency, especially among investors, large corporations, and public officials, to reduce the probability of failure to the point that the consequences of success become inconsequential [… ] Skeptics and cynics never did the impossible, and we need the impossible to bridge our resource gap. Please don’t call a committee hearing or start a research study to follow up on this idea. Just go do it.” This is a passionate, mission-driven, and crucial component of entrepreneurship, typically found in greater measure on the founder side.

 

In the end, entrepreneurship is, and must be, both risky and daring. Fortunes, whether they be financial, temporal, or emotional, are won and lost in this pursuit. But as long as you can feel that what you are doing is both risky and daring, you will know that you are on the right path.

 
-Teddy Lee, Contributing Editor

Listener Feedback

Andrew Bogle

One of the best podcasts in terms of being insightful and helpful; thank you! twitter.com/TheFullR…